Novel Cu/CuO/ZnO hybrid hierarchical nanostructures for non-enzymatic glucose sensor application

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.01.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs electrode was fabricated by chemical oxidation and hydrothermal method.

  • Structure and morphology of the as prepared electrodes were examined by XRD and FE-SEM.

  • The sensor showed excellent electrocatalytic activity towards glucose oxidation.

  • The sensitivity and low detection limit of the sensor is 408 μA mM−1 cm−2 and 18 μM.

Abstract

In this report, we have presented a novel CuO nanoleaf/ZnO nanorods (NRs) hierarchical architecture for non-enzymatic glucose sensor applications. The XRD pattern revealed the presence of monoclinic phase for CuO nanoleaf and hexagonal phase for ZnO NRs. FE-SEM images showed the ZnO NR arrays are densely covered on the leaf-shaped CuO nanostructure. The amperometric response indicated that the Cu/CuO/ZnO hybrid electrode has a good response for glucose with a linear range from 0.1 mM to 1 mM with a sensitivity of 408 μA mM−1 cm−2 and a low detection limit of 18 μM. The CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs structure exhibited higher electrocatalytic activity towards glucose oxidation. The greatly enhanced electrochemical catalytic reactivity is mainly attributed to the lower over-potential and larger electroactive surface area of the CuO nanoleaf structure and the one-dimensional ZnO NRs structures.

Introduction

In recent years, biosensors including glucose sensor are most important and essential devices in the day-to-day clinical applications, environmental monitoring, biological and chemical analyses [1], [2], [3]. Among the numerous reports glucose oxidase (GOx) has been widely used to construct various amperometric biosensors, due to its high sensitivity and selectivity to glucose [4], [5]. A majority of glucose biosensors is based on the enzymatic sensors because of their simplicity, relatively low-cost, and high-sensitivity [6], [7], [8]. However, the greatest drawback of enzymatic sensors is their lack of stability due to the intrinsic nature of enzymes [9], [10]. To overcome the above problems, lately a number of studies have been carried out to develop non-enzymatic glucose sensors based on transition metal oxides with high sensitivity, good stability, and low cost, such as NiO, ZnO, CoO, MnO2, and CuO [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. But most of these electrodes have the disadvantages like poor sensitivity and low selectivity, which cause the surface poisoning of adsorbed intermediates and chloride, which greatly limits their applications.

Therefore, the development of a cost-effective, highly selective, fast and reliable non-enzymatic glucose sensor is still greatly demanded. Among the transition metal oxides, copper oxide (CuO) is a p-type semiconductor with a narrow-band gap of 1.2 eV has been extensively studied because of its numerous applications in catalysis, semiconductors, batteries, gas sensors, biosensors, solar cells, magnetic storage media, and field transistors [4], [5], [16], [17], [18]. Further, the nanostructured CuO exhibits a high specific surface area, good electrochemical activity, and the possibility of promoting electron transfer reactions at a lower over-potential [19], [20].

On the other hand, zinc oxide (ZnO) has become one of the most important semiconductor materials used for various applications such as, optics, optoelectronics, sensors, and actuators due to their semiconducting, piezoelectric, and pyroelectric properties [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. A well-aligned ZnO nanorod array with a large specific surface area, higher electron conductivity, many active sites, low-cost and long-term stability has attracted extensive interest applications for photocatalysis, light-emitting diodes (LEDs), dye-sensitized solar cells and sensors [26], [27]. Recently, ZnO nanostructures have considerable attention for the biosensors applications due to the following advantages; biocompatibility, high surface area to volume ratios, chemical stability, facile preparation, low-cost, non-toxicity, bio-safety, fast electron transfer rates, enhanced electrochemical response, and increased sensitivity [8], [28], [29]. In addition, ZnO has a high isoelectric point (IEP) of about 9.5, which makes it suitable for the absorption of protein with low IEPs (GOx = 4.2), as the protein immobilization is primarily driven by the electrostatic interaction [8], [21], [30].

Recently, hybrid nanostructured materials with a high surface area, good conductivity and permeability have been considered to be one of the most significant functional materials for the various emerging research fields, such as, sensor, energy conversion and environmental remediation [31], [32], [33]. The performance of the hybrid nanostructured materials mainly depends upon their size, morphology, composition, structure, crystal phases and crystal facets [34]. Therefore, the controlled synthesis of hybrid metal oxide nanostructures is of considerable interest to achieve the required size, morphology and structure of the hybrid nanostructure. To the best of our knowledge, there are very few reports on the CuO/ZnO nanocomposites for the non-enzymatic glucose sensing applications [35], [36].

In this regard, first time we have reported, a facile, low temperature and cost effective synthesis method in the preparation of CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs hierarchical nanostructure on Cu substrate for the non-enzymatic glucose sensor applications. The formation of these highly active CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs hierarchical structure could serve as a promising electrode material for the enhancing non-enzymatic glucose sensing due to their high surface area and electrical conductivity.

Section snippets

Chemicals

All the chemicals used for our experiments are of research purity and used without further purification. Cu sheets were purchased from The Nilaco Corporation, Japan. Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2⋅6H2O), hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA,(CH2)6N4), polyethylenimine (PEI), zinc acetate (Zn(O2CCH3)2), monoethanolamine (MEA), 2-methoxyethanol, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), potassium hydroxide (KOH), glucose, ascorbic acid (AA), urea, lactose, uric acid (UA), and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) was purchased

Structural and morphological analysis

The crystal structure and purity of the as-prepared samples were evaluated by XRD. Fig. 1 shows the XRD pattern of CuO nanoleaf, ZnO NRs and CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs electrodes. CuO nanoleaf film exhibited a monoclinic structure, and the reflection peaks are indexed to be (1 1 0), (1¯11), (0 0 2) and (1 1 1) planes. ZnO NRs confirmed the hexagonal wurtzite structure. In the case of CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs electrode revealed the presence of phases, monoclinic structure for CuO and hexagonal structure for

Conclusions

In summary, CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs hierarchical nanostructure was successfully prepared by chemical oxidation and hydrothermal method. The structure and morphology of the as-prepared samples were confirmed from XRD and FE-SEM measurements. The electrocatalytic activity of the CuO nanoleaf/ZnO NRs electrode exhibited a better performance towards glucose oxidation. This is due to synergistic effect of combining CuO nanoleaf and the one-dimensional ZnO NRs structures, which increases the

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation (No. 2011-11-06-038) and supported by the 2014 Jeju Sea Grant College Program funded by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), Korea.

References (36)

  • L.C. Jiang et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2010)
  • S. Luo et al.

    Talanta

    (2011)
  • M. Florescu et al.

    Talanta

    (2005)
  • A. Fulati et al.

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2010)
  • I. Katakis et al.

    Trends Anal. Chem.

    (1995)
  • F. Cao et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2012)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Sens. Actuators B

    (2010)
  • S. Cherevko et al.

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • C. Batchelor-McAuley et al.

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2008)
  • D.P. Norton et al.

    Mater. Today

    (2004)
  • B. Saravanakumar et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2013)
  • M. Guo et al.

    J Solid State Chem.

    (2005)
  • C.S. Rout et al.

    J. Mater. Chem.

    (2006)
  • M. Lee et al.

    Anal. Chem.

    (2004)
  • D. Pradhan et al.

    ACS Appl. Mater. Int.

    (2010)
  • W.J. Luo et al.

    ACS Nano

    (2010)
  • X.J. Zhang et al.

    Cryst. Eng. Comm.

    (2010)
  • E. Reitz et al.

    Electroanalysis

    (2008)
  • Cited by (103)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text